In
a recent coaching session I had with an executive I will call Henry, we
reviewed the results of 360-degree feedback interviews I had conducted with
over 12 of his stakeholders (e.g., his boss, direct reports, internal and
external customers) as well as the results of an anonymous survey. Like many
very successful managers, Henry believed he was pretty self-aware, yet was
surprised at some of the feedback he heard, especially from his direct reports
in several Asian countries. While Henry saw himself as a “straight shooter” and
open about his opinions, his Asian direct reports had a different impression.
They described him as intimidating and as someone who argues too much without
listening.
We
know that self-awareness is an important component of emotional intelligence
and for becoming an effective leader. For global managers, I would add that
cultural self-awareness is also an important key to their success interacting
with and getting results through others from various cultures. In psychological
counseling over the past twenty years or so, there has been a strong emphasis
in making sure that therapists are aware of their own assumptions, biases and
values. Various assessments and training have been introduced to enhance
therapists’ competence and their effectiveness (Roysircar, 2004). As Royscircar
notes:
“Therapists must
put their assumptions, values, and biases to scrutiny because they will resort
to these anyway. They need to ask themselves how U.S. sociopolitical issues,
such as prejudice against minority groups, communism, Islamic fundamentalism,
immigration to the U/S., bilingualism, or those with visible physical
differences and disabilities have affected their social views of people and
whether these social views may be related to their theoretical orientation in
professional practice.” (p. 660)
Similarly,
global managers (especially those from the Western world) must also put their
assumptions, values and biases to self-scrutiny since otherwise, they will
resort to these unthinkingly. Their unconscious biases when dealing with others
who don’t speak English very well, whose attire might not fit with what might
be considered appropriate in a corporate setting, or whose physical mannerisms
might be inappropriate in a Western setting will certainly affect their
interactions with and judgments about these individuals.
According
to Eurich (2017), there are two main categories of self-awareness: internal
(understanding yourself) and external (understanding how other people see you).
Her distinction is actually based on self-concept theory; psychologists in this
field use the term objective self-awareness and subjective self-awareness
respectively. Eurich argues that the two are not necessarily correlated but there
is some evidence that these might be influenced by culture.
Cultural
self-awareness is first of all about understanding your own culture, and
acknowledging that part of your behavior (as some anthropologists claim, as
much as 25 percent) may be due to cultural influences. This may difficult to
achieve, especially for those who have never traveled, or who have not been
exposed to cultural diversity. Hall (1973) and Adler (2008) have used the
analogy of a fish that cannot imagine what it is like outside the water because
it has been swimming in that environment all its life.
The second aspect of cultural self-awareness is recognizing
the differences between your culture and other cultures, especially when it
comes to behavior in the work place. Gina, a manager for a global financial
services company whose parents were Puerto Rican, recalled the excitement she
felt when her company asked her to move to London for two years: “In my mind,
London was just like New York. I had travelled internationally before and of
course spoke English; I was set. I came to New York as a young child and
growing up, thought it was the center of the world. I really subscribed to the
cliché that if you can make it here, you can make it anywhere. I expected the
world to conform to my beliefs.”
She remembered some of her initial impressions of her British
colleagues at the F/X desk where she worked. Most of them spoke more than three
languages, and she met one colleague who spoke seven languages. When she
mentioned to him that she wanted to learn another language, he commented, “You
do not speak English, you speak American. We speak English.” Rather than taking
this remark as an insult, Gina reflected on her lack of cultural
self-awareness, and her arrogance in thinking that coming to London would be
easy because she already knew the language. Adler (2008) makes this insightful
comment: “Although we may think that the biggest obstacle to conducting
business around the world is understanding foreigners, the greater difficulty
actually involves becoming aware of our own cultural conditioning.” (p. 81)
A third aspect of cultural self-awareness includes
understanding of different gestures and other non-verbals, which are important
in building our intercultural competence. This ability to understand cultural
rules and codes has been shown to be a predictor of positive interpersonal
outcomes. In an interesting series of studies, Molinsky and his colleagues
(Molinsky et al, 2005) developed a measure which they called the Gesture
Recognition Task (GRT). This was made up of a series of 15 real (e.g., a
shoulder shrug) and 13 fake non-verbal gestures (e.g., twirling the right
finger in front of the body from chest level to above the head). Several
hundred U.S.-born and non-native-born students participated in the study. In
their first study, they also developed a measure of intercultural competence,
and they found a positive relationship between performance on the GRT with
self-ratings of intercultural competence. In a second study, performance on the
GRT was also positively associated with ratings of observers who rated the
students on their intercultural competence, reinforcing the importance of the
ability to “read” cultural non-verbal behaviors.
Even e-mail communication can be influenced by cultural
differences. Holtbrugge and his colleagues (2013) did an interesting study of a
sample of professionals in the IT and services industry of large
multinationals. The sample, which was obtained from professional social
networking sites such as LinkedIn, consisted of 235 participants from 28 different
nationalities, including India, Finland, Germany, USA, and China. According to
the authors, 75-80 percent of virtual team communication is done by e-mail.
They constructed a 23-item questionnaire measuring such dimensions as
directness, promptness, preciseness and task-relatedness. The researchers found
significant differences between respondents coming from high-context (e.g.,
Argentina, Brazil, China, Italy, Pakistan, and Uruguay) and low-context
(Austria, Denmark, Germany, Sweden and the U.S.A.) cultures in their e-mail
communication styles, with high-context, polychronic cultures preferring more
formal but more fluid e-mail communication, and low-context, monochronic
cultures preferring more precise and prompt e-mail communication.
The following are several strategies to enhance your cultural
self-awareness. One, find out what
managers’ impressions are about your own culture. Of course, some of their
impressions may be based on simplistic and even outdated stereotypes. However, they can provide some insights into
the cultural influences that impact workplace behavior in your culture. Some
might not be willing to express their opinions directly for fear of being
“politically incorrect” (although in my experience Europeans seem to be more
candid than Americans about expressing their impressions of different
nationalities). In conversations, therefore, you might have to probe and ask
different questions. For example, you might ask them to compare and contrast
two managers they know who are of the same nationality.
Two, learn about the successes and failures of managers from
your country who have worked in other cultures. For example, Brad, a British
manager of a multinational identified several British colleagues who had been
sent overseas on expatriate assignments. Through his contacts, he found a few
who were successful and others who were less successful in their assignments,
and reached out to them. Learning about the experiences of individuals in both
groups gave him valuable insights on his own cultural self-awareness and
important lessons to apply.
Three, look for opportunities where you can immerse yourself
in a different culture. You might ask, how can I do this unless I actually
travel to that country? Nieto (2006) has described a practice called a cultural
plunge that professors in San Diego State University have been using over many
years. A cultural plunge “…is individual exposure to persons or groups markedly
different in culture (ethnicity, language, socioeconomic status, sexual
orientation, and/or physical exceptionality) from that of the ‘plunger’.”
Examples he gives are attending services or religious ceremonies of a group
with a different ethnicity (e.g., African-American) or language (e.g.,
Vietnamese), or interacting with homeless people or people with disabilities. The
plunges don’t have to be that long; to help with cultural self-awareness,
however, it is important to reflect on the experience in a structured or
organized way. Adapting Nieto’s suggestions, I would suggest that after
whatever “plunge” you undertake, make sure that you jot down or type the
following right after your plunge: what you experienced, your emotional
response, whether the plunge reinforced or challenged your stereotypes, lessons
learned and implications for your role as a global manager or leader.
Adler, Nancy J. 2008. International Dimensions of
Organizational Behavior, Fifth Edition. Mason, OH: South-Western
Publishing.
Eurich, T. (2017). Insight. New York: Crown Business.
Hall, E. (1973). The Silent Language. New York: Anchor
Books.
Heine, S. Positive
Self-Views: Understanding Universals and Variability Across Cultures. Journal of Cultural and Evolutionary
Psychology, 2: 109-122.
Molinsky, Andrew. 2007. Cross-Cultural Code-Switching: The
Psychological Challenges of Adapting Behavior in Foreign Cultural Interactions.
Academy of Management Review 32(2): 622–640.
Nieto, J. (2006). The
Cultural Plunge: Cultural Immersion as a Means of Promoting Self-Awareness and
Cultural Sensitivity Among Student Teachers. Teacher Education Quarterly, Winter: 75-84.
Roysircar, G. (2004).
Cultural Self-Awareness Assessment: Practice Examples from Psychology Training.
Professional Psychology: Research and
Practice, 35 (6): 658-666.
No comments:
Post a Comment